Asking how to advocate for the ethical treatment of animals is a fantastic first step to knowing what I am going to say, so thank you for asking.
You appear to feel a concern for pets and animals if you’re asking that. You may feel concern for your own pets, and ripples of the feeling may extend to other pets and animals. Your feelings may build and even last for a little while following the speaker leaves the podium – or TV display.
But feelings aren’t ethics.
People who advocate for the ethical treatment of animals must go beyond feelings. They have to seek proven facts. They need to ignore the bandwagon and search for the parade organizers.
When Americans first used the term in 1849, they were describing a huge wagon that carried the ring in a circus parade. They used the same wagons in parties of successful political campaigns. Theodore Roosevelt’s writings showed he spoke of people”being on the bandwagon” to represent persons who attached themselves to something just because it seemed likely to be successful.
We must turn our attention to the core of the matter, and that is ethics.
We need to start by defining ethical treatment, and that involves a definition of ethics . What do you mean when you say you need to advocate for the ethical treatment of animals?
ETHICS: This term refers to a system of ethical values. We expect physicians, for example, to uphold a system of ethical values called”professional ethics.” By that, we mean that we expect doctors to conduct themselves rightly, doing what is good and refraining from doing what is bad. Wise employers seek out employees who bring good”work ethics” into the job. By that, the employer means they’ll conduct themselves at work in a right way, adopting good character traits like punctuality and dedication, while rejecting bad character traits like procrastination and wasting time.
Consider issues like cloning or animal therapy, and you talk about the”rightness” of this matter, i.e., the ethics of cloning; the ethics of animal treatment. The significant part in our discussion must answer the question of what our convictions tell us is right and wrong.
Ethical thinking must form convictions, not personal preferences, on this and every issue. Those who seek to know how to advocate for the ethical treatment of animals must exercise caution whenever they consider groups who assert such advocacy.
I suggest that you read this quote from the web site of People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA)
“In the meat industry’s rampant abuse of animals and ecological devastation to the tremendous health benefits of a vegetarian diet into helping end world hunger and deplorable working conditions in slaughterhouses, there are countless reasons why more and more people are leaving meat off their plates for good and embracing a healthy and humane vegan diet.”
PETA makes clear on its web site its conviction that animals aren’t ours, and we therefore must not eat them, wear themetc..
People who truly hold such a conviction ignore an immense fact! The source of the notion we call the Golden Rule is the greatest teacher ever to walk the Earth – Jesus Christ. Jesus stated it in Matthew 7:12 and in Luke 6:31:
“… anything you wish that others would do to you, do also to them.” And in Luke: “… as you wish that others would do to you, do this for them.” The Holy Bible, (English Standard Version)
The rule we have come to call the Golden Rule informs us simply and powerfully that we must respect our fellow-man and practice the ethical treatment of the other humans, regardless of similarities or differences. This must become a strong conviction in the heart of every person born. Why? Humans have souls, and just a soul can deal with moral values.
Besides being dependent on participants with spirits, the Golden Rule introduces a mutual arrangement.
Imagine with me, for a moment, the Golden Rule does extend to animals – and decide for yourself whether you hold PETA’s certainty.
Imagine that I hike in the woods and see a 500-pound male grizzly bear. I must not kill and eat the 500-pound grizzly bear and, conversely, that grizzly bear shouldn’t kill and eat 130-pound me – but it probably will because it has no soul, notion of right and wrong, and no understanding of the Golden Rule.
Imagine that my husband climbs into the forest and sees a foot in front of him a Diamondback rattlesnake, coiled and ready to strike. He must not make the rattlesnake suffer immensely and, conversely, that deadly rattlesnake must never make him suffer immensely – but it probably is because it lacks a soul and cannot distinguish right from wrong or comply with the Golden Rule.
When you seek to advocate for the ethical treatment of animals, you must do so with solid, rational convictions about the connection between you and those critters. You may have a preference about the connection, but you must have a conviction for which you are ready to die if need be.
Maybe we ought to ask how we can best urge for the ethical treatment of animals. What is the moral, ethical way to treat non-humans which have no soul?
Wildlife Removal Melbourne gives us a way to care for animals as we need – rescuing animals with whom man lives, but that some individuals actively endanger for wrong purposes. While I understand that some will judge moral values as individual, they are not. They are international standards which have stood firm for centuries. You can read more about moral values and examine a list of 66 different personality traits at.
NEW ANIMAL RESCUE DONATION PROGRAM
Even if you cannot personally recuse animals in need, you are able to advocate for their faith by joining an animal rescue donation program. A new animal rescue donation program can especially use your help. Why not see them, get the specifics, and get involved at the moment.
Someone asking how to advocate for the ethical treatment of animals can accomplish much more living in the mainstream of life, hammering out sensible convictions about the animal world, and engaging in a new animal rescue donation program that has its feet firmly on the floor.